Evolutionary over revolutionary change

From go-ELSE
Revision as of 00:52, 24 January 2024 by Ppugliese (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ == Description == Revolutionary change has a high risk of failure, therefore change should be evolutionary. == Rationale == Revolutionary change, where a significant change is made in a transactional fashion, has a far higher risk of failure than multiple small incremental changes. An evolutionary approach to change introduction is recommended, with the following considerations: * Ensure those impacted by a change are part of the change process as opposed to...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Description

Revolutionary change has a high risk of failure, therefore change should be evolutionary.

Rationale

Revolutionary change, where a significant change is made in a transactional fashion, has a far higher risk of failure than multiple small incremental changes. An evolutionary approach to change introduction is recommended, with the following considerations:

  • Ensure those impacted by a change are part of the change process as opposed to having the changes done to them.
  • Understand and start from the current context of your organisation and system of work.
  • Use the Scaling Principles as a "Lens" to assess and understand potential opportunities for improvement.
  • Create change hypotheses for the high-priority opportunities.
  • Introduce and support a small number of experiments that can be run and evaluated independently.
  • Use volunteers in the experiments where possible.
  • Apply learnings back into the experiments.
  • Broaden adoption when proven and where applicable.

Related Principles