<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://go-else.org:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Minimum_Viable_Product_Owners</id>
	<title>Minimum Viable Product Owners - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://go-else.org:443/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Minimum_Viable_Product_Owners"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://go-else.org:443/index.php?title=Minimum_Viable_Product_Owners&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T15:52:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://go-else.org:443/index.php?title=Minimum_Viable_Product_Owners&amp;diff=25&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ppugliese: Created page with &quot;__NOTOC__ == Description == Aim to create a product organisation with the least amount of Product Owners in order to maximise the “Scope of Accountability” of each Product Owner and allow for decisions that have a more holistic impact on the value-chain.  == Rationale == A system of work with fewer Product Owners will: * Increase the relative “Scope of Ownership” for each Product Owner * Reduce the complexity of collaboration and coordination overhead * Reduce de...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://go-else.org:443/index.php?title=Minimum_Viable_Product_Owners&amp;diff=25&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2024-01-23T23:42:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;__NOTOC__ == Description == Aim to create a product organisation with the least amount of Product Owners in order to maximise the “Scope of Accountability” of each Product Owner and allow for decisions that have a more holistic impact on the value-chain.  == Rationale == A system of work with fewer Product Owners will: * Increase the relative “Scope of Ownership” for each Product Owner * Reduce the complexity of collaboration and coordination overhead * Reduce de...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
Aim to create a product organisation with the least amount of Product Owners in order to maximise the “Scope of Accountability” of each Product Owner and allow for decisions that have a more holistic impact on the value-chain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rationale ==&lt;br /&gt;
A system of work with fewer Product Owners will:&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the relative “Scope of Ownership” for each Product Owner&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduce the complexity of collaboration and coordination overhead&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduce decision latency&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase clarity and cohesion of the vision for the value stream&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reducing the number of Product Owners below a viable level for a given scale of programme will breach the [[Mental Workload]] and effectiveness of the Product Owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related Principles ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Limit Product Owner Mental Workload]] - This is a contending principle: the fewer Product Owners there are, the more [[Mental Workload]] they will have to bear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Minimise unnecessary complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Each team &amp;quot;sees&amp;quot; exactly one Product Owner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Organise around value streams]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scale only when you need to]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ppugliese</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>